[Aldor-l] No Const Bug

[Ralf Hemmecke]

On 08/19/2006 03:46 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Christian Aistleitner" <tmgisi at gmx.at> writes:
> 
> | Hello,
> | 
> | On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 02:22:29 +0200, Ralf Hemmecke <ralf at hemmecke.de> wrote:
> | 
> | > Who can tell me whether the compiler behaves correctly when it rejects
> | > that program below...
> | 
> | I guess, this is actually correct behaviour ;)
> | Bear in mind, that { } does not necessarily create a new scope.
> | It does create new scopes for foo and bar, but not for fooConst and  
> | barConst.
> 
> What is the rationale for that design point?

I am looking forward to an answer to this question.

> -- Gaby